Fact 119 of 123 in the story · Tuesday 27 October, 18h42
La loi « casseurs-payeurs » jugée contraire à la Constitution par un juriste
Le professeur de droit constitutionnel Benjamin Morel estime que la loi « casseurs-payeurs » est un texte d'affichage contraire au droit et inapplicable.
- Category
- Politics
- Severity
- Low
- Place
National
- Detected
- 27 Oct, 18h42
- Updated
- 27 Oct, 18h42
- Reference
- no.2027
What changed in the story at that point
1 article · 1 source · 1 bord sur 3 · outlets: left 1, centre 0, right 0
Story angles
This event does not yet have its own comparison: here is the story's Violence on 17 October: judicial follow-up and debate on the 'pay‑payer' law.
The three sides cover the same issue (assessment of the damage, the 'pay‑payer' law, the 31 October measures) but highlight it differently: the left focuses on legal critiques and freedoms, the centre on parliamentary debate and aid measures, the right on the cost to insurers, public order and political responsibility.
Left
Highlights criticism of the 'pay‑payer' law (repressive nature, unconstitutionality, attack on the right to demonstrate), the blocking of the investigative commission by the RN, as well as the testimony of a young woman injured in the eye in Mulhouse and the Macron‑era assessment of freedoms.
Centre
Focuses on the content and debate surrounding the 'pay‑payer' law (collective responsibility, ecological opposition), on public aid to affected shops, the economic impact and the related judicial incidents of the violence.
Right
Highlights the financial cost (insurance tax, a billion euros of damage), security measures and withdrawal of calls to insurrection, analyses of the causes of the violence (immigrationism, 'revolutionary software') and critical positions toward Emmanuel Macron.
Common points
- =Chambers of commerce and industry count about 2,500 affected shops and more than a billion euros in damage
- =The 'pay‑payer' bill is examined in the Senate starting 27 October
- =The government announces aid of up to €10,000 for the most affected shops
- =Laurent Nuñez announces the renewal of a security measure for 31 October
Divergences
- ≠The left stresses the unconstitutionality and repressive nature of the 'pay‑payer' law, while the right cites an LR senator claiming the text has been 'enriched to make it more constitutional'
- ≠The left details the RN's blocking of the investigative commission and the testimony of the young woman injured in the eye, angles absent from the right's coverage
- ≠The right mentions an 'riot tax' on insurance and analyses on immigrationism or the 'revolutionary software', absent from left and centre articles
- ≠The left points to Emmanuel Macron's record on public freedoms, while the right relays a mayor's judgment that his attitude is 'unworthy of a president of the Republic'
Written by an AI from headlines and extracts only of all events in the story · 27 Oct, 19h08
Lire les sources · 1 article, 1 source
- 18h42L'HumanitéLeftAnalysis27 OctPourquoi la loi casseurs-payeurs est « contraire à la Constitution » : entretien avec le professeur de droit Benjamin Morel
Pour le professeur de droit constitutionnel Benjamin Morel, la loi « casseurs-payeurs » est un « texte d’affichage », contraire à notre droit et inapplicable dans les faits.
Further reading
Go up the thread
In the same story
- Pillages of October 17: up to 10,000 euros in aid for affected businesses27 Oct
- Toulouse : un jeune condamné pour le vol d'une doudoune lors des violences du 17 octobre27 Oct
- « Rioters-pay » bill: text arrives in the Senate27 Oct
- Caen : un lycéen condamné à six mois ferme après une attaque le 17 octobre27 Oct
- Nearly 2,500 shops vandalized during the October 17 protests27 Oct
- The October 17 riots weigh on French tourism27 Oct
People and organisations cited