Acturadar

France in real time

English translation in progress — this text is still shown in French.

Violence and looting of 17 October: political reactions and support measures

Ongoing160 events · of the 23 Oct au 28 Oct · latest fact at 13h11

View entire story

Fact 152 of 160 in the story · Wednesday 28 October, 11h23

Débat sur la possibilité de neutraliser les réseaux sociaux en cas d'émeutes

Le débat porte sur la capacité du gouvernement à neutraliser les réseaux sociaux lors d'émeutes, dans le cadre des discussions autour de la loi « casseurs-payeurs ».

Category
Politics
Severity
Low
Place

National

Detected
28 Oct, 11h23
Updated
28 Oct, 11h23
Reference
no.2703
01

What changed in the story at that point

Just before10h43 · −41 min

À Lille, l'État et la ville accompagnent les commerces dégradés les 17 et 18 octobre

Low· Economy · no.2823
Here · 11h23
Just after11h30 · +7 min

Agression contre l'immeuble de CNews et du JDD : un salarié de Mediawan mis à pied

Low· Society · no.2767
02

Who is covering it, and from what angle

Method
1Right

1 article · 1 source · 1 bord sur 3 · outlets: left 0, centre 0, right 1

Story angles

This event does not yet have its own comparison: here is the story's Violence and looting of 17 October: political reactions and support measures.

The three sides cover the adoption of the 'casseurs-payeurs' bill in the Senate, but the left insists on the repressive toughening and the complaint filed by the family of a deceased demonstrator, the centre details the content of the text and local news items, while the right highlights the economic cost of the violence and the capabilities of the security forces.

Left

Highlights the toughening of the text by the Senate, presented as a pact between the majority and the far right restricting the right to demonstrate and freedom of expression. Emphasises the complaint filed by the family of a demonstrator who died on 17 October and the suspected role of tear gas, as well as a critique of the notion of authority.

Centre

Details the content of the adopted and toughened text (seizures, bans on demonstrations, blocking of social networks) and relays local news items, including the complaint filed by the family of a man who died. Also reports the analysis that two-thirds of content linking violence and immigration comes from abroad, and the remarks of the mayor of Limoges.

Right

Insists on the material cost of the violence (more than one billion euros in damage, thousands of businesses affected) and on the capacity of the security forces to hold out. Deals with the blocking of social networks, hostility to an 'riots tax' on insurance and facts of looting and theft of weapons.

Common points

  • =The Senate adopted the 'casseurs-payeurs' bill by 229 votes to 105
  • =The violence of 17 and 18 October and its aftermath constitute the context of these debates
  • =The family of a man who died on 17 October in Paris filed a complaint incriminating tear gas
  • =Aid measures for affected businesses and the removal of announcements of stolen items are announced

Divergences

  • ≠The left presents the text as a liberticidal toughening and a pact with the far right, an angle absent on the right
  • ≠The right highlights the economic cost of the violence and the pressure on the security forces, little developed on the left
  • ≠The left highlights the complaint against the security forces after a death, while the right insists on looting and theft of weapons
  • ≠Opposition to an 'riots tax' on insurance is relayed on the right but absent from the other sides

Written by an AI from headlines and extracts only of all events in the story · 28 Oct, 11h58

03

Lire les sources · 1 article, 1 source

Publication order
  1. 11h23
    Le FigaroCentre-rightOpinion28 Oct
    Le gouvernement doit-il pouvoir neutraliser les réseaux sociaux en cas d'émeutes ?
04

Further reading

Keywords

#réseaux sociaux · #émeutes · #censure