Jean-Michel Blanquer questioned at the Senate over the high school crisis

Common points

• =The government announced a series of measures, including an evolution or replacement of Parcoursup by 2028.
• =Student and youth representatives consider the announcements insufficient and the mobilisation continues.
• =A debate on Parcoursup or orientation takes place in the National Assembly.
• =The reception of influencers at Matignon before the student organisations is mentioned and sparks controversy.

Divergences

• ≠The left presents the concessions as crumbs and insists on the weakness of power, while the right highlights calls for a return to class and the government's efforts to defuse the crisis.
• ≠The left criticises the reception of influencers as a communication operation, while the right describes it as a bypass of student organisations and the centre focuses more on the financing and applicability of the measures.
• ≠The centre highlights divisions among students and local scepticism about the resumption of blockades, an angle less central to the left where the emphasis is on continuing the mobilisation and LFI's calls.
• ≠The right revisits Jean-Michel Blanquer's reforms and his hearing in the Senate, an element little emphasised by the left and centre articles provided.