Fact 31 of 31 in the story · Friday 13 November, 07h08

L'arsenal antiterroriste de 2015 utilisé contre les manifestants

Alors que la France connaît une mobilisation lycéenne et des manifestations contre la vie chère, des associations dénoncent l'usage de mesures héritées de l'état d'urgence de 2015 pour assigner à résidence des manifestants.

In brief

Justice event (severity: notable) nationwide, first detected on 13 November 2026 at 07:08. Reported by 1 source (1 article), last updated on 13 November 2026 at 07:08. Part of the story “In France, appeals and criticisms against obstructions to the right to demonstrate”.

Category: Justice
Severity: Notable
Place: National
Detected: 13 Nov, 07h08
Updated: 13 Nov, 07h08
Reference: no.18304

What changed in the story at that point

Just before07h00 · −8 min

Doubs : le directeur de la police répond aux critiques sur le maintien de l'ordre

Low· Security · no.18310

Here · 07h08

Latest fact of the story to date

Who is covering it, and from what angle

Method

1Uncategorised

1 article · 1 source · no rated outlet covers this topic yet (public service, agencies, official accounts…)

Story angles

This event does not yet have its own comparison: here is the story's In France, appeals and criticisms against obstructions to the right to demonstrate.

Left-wing and center media highlight criticisms of counter-terrorism measures targeting protesters and the judicial decision disavowing them, while right-wing media emphasize the mobilization of the counter-terrorism arsenal to neutralize radical and violent profiles.

Left

Denunciation of an authoritarian turn, infringement on the freedom to demonstrate and misuse of counter-terrorism against left-wing activists, with emphasis on appeals and the court decision unfavorable to the executive.

Centre

Explanation of how Micas work and emphasis on criticisms from lawyers, magistrates and NGOs denouncing the conflation of terrorism and activism, while reporting individual cases.

Right

Presentation of the measures as a means of neutralizing violent and radical profiles before demonstrations, relying on confidential documents and figures on monitored individuals.

Common points

=Individual administrative control and surveillance measures (Micas) have been used to prevent people from demonstrating around October 31.
=These measures are inherited from the state of emergency and mobilize the counter-terrorism arsenal.
=Appeals have been filed and the administrative courts have examined or disavowed some of these measures.

Divergences

≠The left and center emphasize the infringement on the freedom to demonstrate and the authoritarian nature of the measures, while the right highlights the need to neutralize violent and radical profiles.
≠The left and center cite criticisms from lawyers, magistrates and NGOs against the conflation of terrorism and activism, absent from right-wing coverage.
≠The right stresses that the Interior Ministry assumes these measures and has confidential instructions, while the left and center report that the ministry did not appear in court to justify them.

Written by an AI from headlines and extracts only of all events in the story · 12 Nov, 03h05

Lire les sources · 1 article, 1 source

Publication order

07h08
France 24Wire13 Nov
Colère sociale : l'arsenal antiterroriste né des attentats de 2015 utilisé contre les manifestants
Alors que la France est secouée par la mobilisation lycéenne et des manifestations contre la vie chère, des associations de défense des droits de l'Homme dénoncent l'utilisation par le gouvernement de mesures héritées de l'état d'urgence décrété suite aux attentats de 2015. Elles ont notamment été employées pour assigner à résidence des personnes identifiées pour leur activité politique.

L'arsenal antiterroriste de 2015 utilisé contre les manifestants

What changed in the story at that point

Who is covering it, and from what angle

Lire les sources · 1 article, 1 source

Further reading