Acturadar.comFrance in real time

English translation in progress — this text is still shown in French.

Petition for the closure of CNews: more than 650,000 signatures

Ongoing19 events · of the 29 Oct au 3 Nov · latest fact at 17h30

View entire story

Fact 17 of 19 in the story · Tuesday 3 November, 16h52

L'Arcom saisit directement la justice après les propos d'Éric Zemmour

L'Arcom a saisi la justice au sujet des sorties d'Éric Zemmour après le 17 octobre, où il avait évoqué sur LCI des « hordes de barbares maghrébins et africains ».

In brief

Politics event (severity: low) nationwide, first detected on 3 November 2026 at 16:52. Reported by 2 sources (2 articles), last updated on 3 November 2026 at 17:15. Part of the story “Petition for the closure of CNews: more than 650,000 signatures”.

·
Category
Politics
Severity
Low
Place

National

Detected
3 Nov, 16h52
Updated
3 Nov, 17h15
Reference
no.8379
01

What changed in the story at that point

02

Who is covering it, and from what angle

Method
1Left
1Centre

2 articles · 2 sources · 2 bords sur 3 · outlets: left 1, centre 1, right 0

Story angles

This event does not yet have its own comparison: here is the story's Petition for the closure of CNews: more than 650,000 signatures.

The left treats the petition as a legitimate citizen movement targeting a problematic channel, emphasizing Arcom's reprimands and the notion of propaganda, while highlighting procedural limitations. The center focuses on signature thresholds and possible institutional steps. The right presents the initiative as an attempt at censorship threatening freedom of expression and pluralism, citing politicians and editorialists supportive of CNews.

Left

Highlights the popular legitimacy of the petition, criticisms of CNews' editorial line (described as propaganda or far-right), Arcom's reprimands, and internal left-wing debates about whether the channel is 'respectable'.

Centre

Focuses on signature numbers, crossing the 500,000 threshold, and institutional steps (committee, debate in the plenary chamber), raising questions about the chances of success.

Right

Presents the petition as an enterprise of censorship and silencing, emphasizes the defense of freedom of expression and pluralism, cites RN, Horizons politicians and CNews editorialists critical of the petition, and mentions a supporting petition for the channel.

Common points

  • =The petition surpassed the 500,000 signature threshold, opening the way to a possible debate in the National Assembly
  • =The petition was deposited in June on the National Assembly website
  • =LFI MP Thomas Portes makes the closure of CNews a priority
  • =A supporting petition for CNews was also launched

Divergences

  • ≠The left describes CNews as a far-right channel or propaganda machine, a term repeated by the center as a quote, while the right denounces censorship
  • ≠The left highlights Arcom's reprimands against the channel, an angle absent from right-wing articles
  • ≠The right highlights criticisms from Marine Le Pen, Éric Ciotti, and Sarah Knafo against the petition, actors absent from left-wing and center articles
  • ≠The left and center emphasize procedural limitations (role of Arcom, classification by the committee), while the right centers its argument on freedom of expression

Written by an AI from headlines and extracts only of all events in the story · 3 Nov, 14h57

03

Read sources · 2 articles, 2 sources

Publication order
  1. 16h52
    HuffPost FranceCentre-leftWire3 Nov
    L’Arcom a directement saisi la justice pour ces sorties d’Éric Zemmour après le 17 octobre

    Le candidat d’extrême droite à la dernière présidentielle avait affirmé sur LCI que « des hordes de barbares maghrébins et africains » étaient rentrées « dans les villes ».

  2. 17h15
    La CroixCentreWire3 Nov
    Discrimination : l’Arcom saisit la justice après des propos d’Éric Zemmour

    L'Arcom a saisi la justice mardi 3 novembre après des déclarations d'Éric Zemmour sur LCI, BFMTV et CNews, jugées discriminatoires. Le président du régulateur, Martin Ajdari, qualifie cette démarche de « relativement rare ».

04

Further reading