Social crisis: political reactions to the high school student mobilization

Common points

• =The high school mobilisation and the inter-union's call to continue the movement are present in all three sides.
• =The government has announced measures, including the replacement of Parcoursup in 2028.
• =A debate on Parcoursup or orientation took place in the National Assembly.

Divergences

• ≠The left highlights police violence and maintaining order before the meeting at Beauvau; this theme does not appear in the centre and right excerpts.
• ≠The right highlights the issue of selection and the goal of returning to class; the left presents the announcements as insufficient concessions and calls for the struggle to be amplified.
• ≠The centre mainly reports speeches by various actors and describes the parliamentary debate as poorly substantive; the left emphasises the government's lack of ideas and the right on the potentially dilatory nature of the debate.
• ≠The left highlights underfunding and the reduction in regional funding for renovation; this angle is not taken up in the centre and right excerpts.