Detected on Saturday 24 October, 12h00
Writer Eric Vuillard analyzes the social anger of October 17
The author of 'Orphans' looks back at the day of October 17 and at an anger that he considers to be growing in the face of inequality and the rise of authority.
- Category
- Society
- Severity
- Info
- Place
National
- Detected
- 24 Oct, 12h00
- Updated
- 24 Oct, 12h00
- Reference
- no.217
2 articles · 2 sources · 2 bords sur 3 · outlets: left 1, centre 1, right 0
Angle comparison
Both texts address social protest around October 17, but the left-wing title highlights the political dimension of anger, while the center title insists on the victims of abuses and the responsibility of speeches on the revolt.
Left
The article in L'Obs presents Eric Vuillard looking back at the day of October 17 and at an anger that he considers to be growing, linked to the increase in inequality and the rise of authority. The title emphasizes that such an angry crowd cannot be deprived of its political dimension.
Centre
The article in La Croix gives the floor to Erwan Le Morhedec, who deems it unacceptable that the victims of abuses during last week's demonstrations are considered 'collateral'. He questions the responsibility of those who want to transform a rebellious people and refuses to see France depicted as a country where only sacking would allow one to be heard.
Right
No coverage from this side.
Common points
- =Both texts refer to the demonstrations of the week of October 17 and a context of revolt or social anger.
- =Both texts discuss how to qualify and politically interpret the protest.
Divergences
- ≠The left-wing text highlights inequality and the rise of authority as drivers of anger; the center text highlights the victims of abuses and the responsibility of speeches on the revolt.
- ≠The left-wing text emphasizes the political dimension of angry crowds; the center text insists on refusing to see France depicted as a country where only sacking would allow one to be heard.
Written by an AI from headlines and extracts only · 25 Oct, 12h19
Read sources · 2 articles, 2 sources
- 11h46La CroixCentreOpinion24 Oct« Ne laissons pas dépeindre notre France comme un pays où seule la mise à sac permettrait de se faire entendre »
Il est inacceptable que les victimes des exactions lors des manifestations de la semaine dernière soient considérées comme « collatérales », comme certains l’affirment, estime Erwan Le Morhedec. Il met en cause la responsabilité de ceux qui veulent « transformer un peuple révolté en peuple révolutionnaire ».
- 12h00L'ObsCentre-leftOpinion24 OctEric Vuillard : « Face à de telles foules en colère, on ne peut pas évacuer la dimension politique »
L’auteur des « Orphelins », prix Goncourt 2017, revient sur la journée du 17 octobre et sur les raisons d’une colère qui, selon lui, prend toujours plus d’ampleur face à la hausse des inégalités et à la montée de l’autorité.
Further reading
People cited
Keywords
#17 octobre · #mobilisation · #inégalités · #analyse · #violences · #tribune · #débat
Go up the thread
On the same subject
- Le sociologue Stéphane Sirot analyse la colère sociale en France28 Oct
- Pillage et émeutes du 17 octobre : l'analyse de Jérôme Fourquet et Ruben Rabinovitch26 Oct
- Le philosophe Tristan Garcia analyse le 17 octobre et la mobilisation lycéenne28 Oct
- Le « 20 h » de France 2 critiqué pour son reportage en immersion sur le 17 octobre26 Oct
People and organisations cited