Fact 3 of 3 in the story · Thursday 12 November, 09h43
Op-ed challenges use of Article 11 for immigration referendums
Philosopher Albert Mendiri considers doubtful the interpretation of Article 11 of the Constitution invoked by several 2027 presidential candidates to legitimize immigration referendums.
In brief
Politics event (severity: low) nationwide, first detected on 12 November 2026 at 09:43. Reported by 1 source (1 article), last updated on 12 November 2026 at 09:43. Part of the story “RN constitutional revision challenged by legal scholars”.
- Category
- Politics
- Severity
- Low
- Place
National
- Detected
- 12 Nov, 09h43
- Updated
- 12 Nov, 09h43
- Reference
- no.17136
What changed in the story at that point
110 constitutional lawyers contest Marine Le Pen's referendum path
1 article · 1 source · 1 bord sur 3 · outlets: left 0, centre 1, right 0
Angle comparison
A comparison is written as soon as the event is covered by at least two sides (left, centre, right).
Lire les sources · 1 article, 1 source
- 09h43La CroixCentreOpinion12 Nov« Pourquoi brandir l’article 11 de la Constitution pour légitimer certains référendums n’est pas possible »
En invoquant le référendum gaulliste du 28 octobre 1962, plusieurs candidats à la présidentielle 2027 entendent légitimer des référendums sur l’immigration via l’article 11 de la Constitution. Une interprétation douteuse, selon le philosophe Albert Mendiri.
Further reading
In the same story
On the same subject
People and organisations cited