Acturadar.comFrance in real time

English translation in progress — this text is still shown in French.

Petition against CNews and Arcom's referral to justice over Éric Zemmour's remarks

Ongoing32 events · of the 29 Oct au 4 Nov · latest fact at 19h10

View entire story

Fact 32 of 32 in the story · Wednesday 4 November, 19h10

La pétition contre CNews dépasse 850 000 signatures

La pétition demandant la suppression de CNews de l'audiovisuel français a dépassé 850 000 signatures le 4 novembre, relançant le débat sur l'interdiction d'une chaîne.

In brief

Politics event (severity: low) nationwide, first detected on 4 November 2026 at 19:10. Reported by 1 source (1 article), last updated on 4 November 2026 at 19:10. Part of the story “Petition against CNews and Arcom's referral to justice over Éric Zemmour's remarks”.

·
Category
Politics
Severity
Low
Place

National

Detected
4 Nov, 19h10
Updated
4 Nov, 19h10
Reference
no.9661
01

What changed in the story at that point

02

Who is covering it, and from what angle

Method
1Uncategorised

1 article · 1 source · no rated outlet covers this topic yet (public service, agencies, official accounts…)

Story angles

This event does not yet have its own comparison: here is the story's Petition against CNews and Arcom's referral to justice over Éric Zemmour's remarks.

The three sides cover the same facts (petition surpassing 700,000 signatures, Arcom's referral to justice regarding Zemmour's remarks), but the left emphasizes the content of the remarks and the regulator's history, the center focuses on procedures and their rarity, and the right highlights the denunciation of a censorship attempt and defense of the channel.

Left

Highlights Zemmour's racist remarks ("hordes of Maghrebi and African barbarians," "remigration"), Arcom's past "leniency" according to Mediapart, and internal criticisms within the left against Jérôme Guedj; describes CNews as an "extreme right" channel and underscores the number of formal warnings.

Centre

Presents procedural facts: number of signatures, MPs' decision on a debate, Arcom's "relatively rare" referral, citing the regulator's president and raising the issue of freedom of expression.

Right

Denounces an "offensive against press freedom" and a "temptation to censor," cites officials and editorialists (Alloncle, Giesbert, Praud, Thevenot) as well as left-wing criticisms of Guedj, and questions Arcom's impartiality.

Common points

  • =The petition calling for the closure of CNews has surpassed 700,000 signatures, and MPs must decide on a potential debate.
  • =Arcom referred the matter to justice on November 3 regarding Éric Zemmour's remarks made on October 18 on LCI, BFMTV, and CNews.
  • =The remarks notably concern "remigration" and terms targeting Maghrebi and African populations.
  • =Jérôme Guedj described CNews's editorial line as "respectable" and was criticized by the left.

Divergences

  • ≠The left describes CNews as an "extreme right" channel and mentions Arcom's past "leniency" (Mediapart), an angle absent from the center and the right.
  • ≠The right presents the petition as an infringement on press freedom and questions Arcom's impartiality, an angle absent from the left and the center.
  • ≠The center emphasizes the "relatively rare" nature of the referral and parliamentary procedure, while the left focuses on the content of the remarks.

Written by an AI from headlines and extracts only of all events in the story · 4 Nov, 20h28

03

Lire les sources · 1 article, 1 source

Publication order
  1. 19h10
    franceinfoWire4 Nov
    Peut-on interdire une chaîne de télé ?

    Une pétition sur le site de l'Assemblée nationale pour "supprimer CNews de l'audiovisuel français" a dépassé les 850 000 signatures, mercredi 4 novembre. Lancé en juin par un particulier, ce texte a gagné en popularité après l'attentat raciste de Trappes (Yvelines) et les critiques portées par des responsables politiques de gauche à l'encontre de la chaîne de la galaxie Bolloré, accusée de diffuser des propos discriminatoires et de favoriser l'extrême droite. Mais cette mobilisation peut-elle vraiment mener à son interdiction ?

04

Further reading