Acturadar.comFrance in real time

English translation in progress — this text is still shown in French.

Petition against CNews: dismissal by the Assembly and reactions

Ongoing97 events · of the 29 Oct au 13 Nov · latest fact at 09h57

View entire story

Fact 93 of 97 in the story · Thursday 12 November, 11h06

Pétition contre CNews : Braun-Pivet pressée de la soumettre aux députés

La commission des affaires culturelles a ignoré le million de signataires demandant la suppression de CNews. La présidente de l'Assemblée pourrait user de son pouvoir pour soumettre la pétition aux députés.

In brief

Politics event (severity: low) nationwide, first detected on 12 November 2026 at 11:06. Reported by 1 source (1 article), last updated on 12 November 2026 at 11:06. Part of the story “Petition against CNews: dismissal by the Assembly and reactions”.

·
Category
Politics
Severity
Low
Place

National

Detected
12 Nov, 11h06
Updated
12 Nov, 11h06
Reference
no.17961
01

What changed in the story at that point

02

Who is covering it, and from what angle

Method
1Left

1 article · 1 source · 1 bord sur 3 · outlets: left 1, centre 0, right 0

Story angles

This event does not yet have its own comparison: here is the story's Petition against CNews: dismissal by the Assembly and reactions.

The three sides agree on the factual dismissal of the petition by the committee, but differ in interpretation: the left denounces a denial of debate in the face of one million signatures, the right welcomes a decision protecting freedom of expression and denounces a left-wing offensive, the center focuses on the voting procedures, precedents, and possible legislative follow-ups.

Left

Highlights the absence of debate despite more than one million signatures, denounces a 'burial' and contempt for signatories, cites the petition's author, calls for boycott by students and high schoolers, and demands a public debate or intervention by the Assembly President.

Centre

Focuses on the behind-the-scenes of the vote (who voted what, role of the LR rapporteur), on comparison with other petitions with high signature counts, on reactions (Raymond Domenech), and on the possible opening of a debate on an information law.

Right

Welcomes the rejection in the name of freedom of expression, recalls that the removal of a channel falls under Arcom, not Parliament, denounces a 'totalitarian temptation' or 'intellectual terrorism' by the left, and highlights reactions from right-wing officials welcoming the rejection and the gesture of an LFI MP towards a channel journalist.

Common points

  • =The Cultural Affairs Committee of the National Assembly dismissed the petition demanding the removal of CNews on November 10, 2026
  • =The petition had gathered more than one million signatures
  • =The dismissal was voted 28 to 25
  • =Mixed reactions followed, between satisfaction on the right and criticism denouncing the lack of debate

Divergences

  • ≠The left presents the decision as a denial of debate and contempt for signatories; the right presents it as a defense of freedom of expression
  • ≠The right insists on the competence of Arcom rather than Parliament; the left demands a parliamentary debate on the application of laws and the role of Arcom
  • ≠The left highlights the call for a boycott by students and high schoolers; the right highlights reactions from right-wing officials welcoming the rejection
  • ≠The center emphasizes the possible opening of an information law; this angle does not appear in the left and right excerpts

Written by an AI from headlines and extracts only of all events in the story · 13 Nov, 03h45

03

Lire les sources · 1 article, 1 source

Publication order
  1. 11h06
    LibérationLeftWire12 Nov
    Braun-Pivet pressée de sauver la pétition contre CNews

    La commission des affaires culturelles a décidé d’ignorer les 1 million de signataires demandant la suppression de la chaîne. La présidente de l’Assemblée pourrait user de son pouvoir pour soumettre la pétition aux députés.

04

Further reading